Understanding zero tolerance law is of utmost importance for law students. Since its inception, it has been widely criticized for misusing it against ethnic communities. Secondly, law students must research this thoroughly to improve their assignments.
In this blog, we will explore this topic extensively. We will also discuss how this law is misused against ethnic communities. Let’s fast-track your learning and get you started on your law assignments quickly and efficiently.
Zero tolerance law means making policies that punish everyone who violates the law. That translates into severe punishments for all offenders regardless of age, gender and race. This law is used widely across all the US states in schools, road safety and against terrorism.
There are many opinions on the existence and use of this policy. Proponents of this have the belief that this law discourages criminal offenses from taking place. On the contrary, opponents say this law nullifies any logical reasons or extenuating circumstances.
Therefore, a lack of cooperation in understanding zero tolerance law makes it controversial. It’s also been used extensively to target ethnic communities in the past. When applied, a minor under the zero tolerance law can be as old as an adult. Thus, it’s regarded as both unethical and a sign of injustice.
There are many ways in which this law is proven to be too old and risky for society. Here we will discuss the zero tolerance policy used on school premises and its results.
In today’s ever-changing world, zero tolerance law should be subject to review since it was created in the 1980s. Zero tolerance in a school dictates severe punishments to students. It’s human nature to fight, argue or deviate from norms or rules.
There are many instances where a student is subject to intolerance by their classmates. In such cases, they might do something in reaction. A zero tolerance law will propel the idea of reprimand or even expulsion from the school. Teachers, vice principals or principals won’t see the extenuating factors. This way, a student’s academic career will be put at risk.
Secondly, many studies on students validate that ethnic minorities are subjected to prejudice. The dropout rate of American students consists of 70% of African American students, regardless of gender. Many black students face racism and discrimination regarding merit based scholarships.
In some instances, the zero tolerance law solved a few issues related to fights at school. Still, students who belong to minorities face difficulties and resort to violence. In those circumstances, factors that lead to the development of such behaviors are negated. School administration and guidance counselors fail miserably in eliminating factors that give rise to rebellious actions.
Students, when assaulted, raped, or body, slut shamed outside of the premises, choose the way of silence. Incidences like this propagate the idea of doing self-harm or harming the perpetrator. School administration expels or even reports these students to police who take such self-defense actions.
Often, school teachers misuse this law and punish young students out of prejudice. That punishment results in both loss of grades and respect among classmates. Using zero tolerance law, teachers and school administration exempt themselves from any type of accountability.
This misuse results in many school shootings and an increase in the college dropout rate. Zero tolerance policy dictates to eliminate all reasons and circumstances, psychological or physical and take severe actions.
In the 21st century, there’s no room for severe punishments if the accuser is the perpetrator. Furthermore, a critical analysis is needed to review it from a 360-degree perspective. This way, we can minimize the damage caused by this law and hold only responsible persons with concrete evidence.
Zero tolerance law is also a headache for underage driving and drinking. The minimum legal drinking age is 21 years, and blood alcohol content should be below 0.08 percent. This law is stricter than the whole world, where the drinking age limit is 18.
Furthermore, federal law also considers having an open bottle in your car an offense. In all cases, even if the passenger drinks, the driver will also be charged. Zero tolerance has created many obstacles, even for occasional drinkers.
Many studies demonstrated that the accident ratio above the age of 29 is the highest in America. At the same time, young adults are subjected to the stereotype of making more mistakes. Zero tolerance on alcohol policy even considers 0.02 percent blood alcohol content as an offense.
Secondly, there’s a big contradiction in this policy. The legal age to apply for a driver’s license is 16 years, whereas the drinking age is 21. Many people argue that both ages should be the same for driving and drinking.
Additionally, strict control of alcohol is essential, but it has to be flexible in some cases. There can be an incidence where one person drinks at home but suffers an immediate need to visit a hospital or an ER. Even such emergencies are treated as an offense when they get caught.
Many areas where Asian or African American communities live have high crime rates. These areas are on a special watch list, and any small incident ends up with charges. Historically it’s evident that many charges of driving under the influence (DUI) were against minorities. Still, the majority of the offenses are registered against these marginalized communities.
These racial discrepancies are at an all-time high. Even the case of George Floyd, who was murdered by police officers. Policies that warrant zero tolerance should be abolished or amended, whether they are doing good or bad.
Many intellectuals agree that zero tolerance policies can be amended for the greater good. Since these policies were made in the early 20th century, when racial injustice was common, it’s time to change them.
There are many schools of thought on this issue, but Amendment is the one getting more attention. It’s also logical to make adjustments according to the passage of time and the future perspective.
A society cannot thrive without the law, and anarchy is always one inch away from taking over; it’s important to amend the law. Some proponents are even suggesting more severe punishments that seem illogical.
In this tech era, there are many ways where we can create mutual understanding on this issue. Government can create a nationwide online poll that would help understand the percentage of people in favor or against it. Any change can be made to this law, according to the survey.
Additionally, the government can also make new legislation that makes zero tolerance flexible and practical for the general public. Members from ethnic minorities can also be added to clear their reservations and to add diversity. This way, an amended law can be introduced with consensus and social inclusion of all stakeholders.
If you are still in sixes and sevens, hire law assignment help and improve your grades effortlessly.
Law students are commonly given tasks such as zero tolerance law. A good command of this subject is the only way to take top grades in your class. We have provided sufficient information that will be helpful for you. In case you are still confused, get assignment help from our experts and make your academic life easy and fun.
We'll revise your work until you're 100% satisfied or refund your payment to make up for the trouble.
